Comparative Study of PCTIG and DPTIG Welding on SMO 254 Joints with Alloy C22 Filler
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work focuses on investigating the effect of conventional pulse TIG (PCTIG) and novel double pulse (DPTIG) welding on microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of SMO 254 (SASS) joints. Both welding techniques used alloy C22 (ERNiCrMo-10) filler metal and different heat input. Microstructural characterization was done using optical microscope, SEM with EDAX techniques. Charpy impact, tensile test and micro-Vickers hardness test was used to investigate the mechanical properties. The fracture analysis was done after tensile and Charpy impact test. The outcome of investigation shows grain refinement, improved tensile strength and more hardness in using DP technique when compared with PC technique. Uniform precipitation noted in double pulse weld metal fusion zone. The DP-TIG weld specimen exhibits a greater strength (209 J) in the Charpy impact test compared to the PC-TIG weld specimen (143.5 J). With a corrosion rate of 0.001269 mpy, the DP-TIG weldment outperformed the PC-TIG weldment, which had a corrosion rate of 0.31977 mpy.
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work two years after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).